Remote sensing modeling of vegetation phylogenetic diversity spatial variation

O. V. Zhukov, D. S. Ganzha, Y. Y. Dubinina

Abstract


The features of the plant community phylogenetic organization of the Dnipro arena within the nature reserve "Dnieper-Orelsky» and the regularities of its spatial variation involving remote sensing of the earth's surface data have been stated. Materials have been collected in the period of 2012-2016 within a nature reserve. Research polygon is within the first terrace (arena) of the river Dnieper valley. The sandy steppe, meadow, forest and marsh communities in the river Protoch floodplain and beam Orlova, as well as artificial pine plantations have been found as being present within research polygon. The vegetation description has been carried out on sites 10×10 m (100 m2). Total 94 descriptions of the geobotanical sample have been made. Data on plant phylogeny have been obtained by Phylomatic service. Phylogenetic diversity of the communities has been assessed by indices Feith, Simpson and Shannon. Phylogenetic analysis has been performed by means of a double principal coordinate analysis (DPCo). Earth remote sensing data in the public domain have been obtained from EarthExplorer. Vegetation index have been calculated by images from the Sentinel satellites. Digital elevation model has been constructed with the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data. At the points in space where the geobotanical samples were collected, the value of spatial predictors has been extracted (vegetation indices and geomorphological indicators derivated from DEM).

A multiple linear regression analysis has been conducted between the values of the axes obtained by DPCoA and environment predictors. The kernel-based machine regression has been used for modeling spatial patterns of dependent variables. The vegetation cover has been found to be represented by 189 species within the investigated polygon. Abundance Phylogenetic Deviation (APD) for the investigated metacommunity has been evaluated to –0.53 which is statistically significantly different from random alternatives (p = 0.001).

APD negative value indicates that phylogenetic organization of the investigated metacommunity is overdispersed. Permutation procedure have allowed to establish that the DPCoA-axes eigenvalues obtained from the real phylogenetic tree was significantly higher than their own number for the random phylogenetic trees for the first seven axes. This indicates that the first seven axes are useful for additional information on metacommunity ordination structure. The axes 1, 2, 3 and 6 largely have been found to be labeled by vegetation index. This means that decryption of satellite images may be interpreted in terms of recent phylogenetic features of vegetation. Axis 4 and 7 have marked by geomorphological predictors. Axis 5 to some extent independent of the predictors considered as a reflection of digression-demutation vegetation caused by anthropogenic impacts.


Keywords


phylogeny; diversity; remote sensing; community ordination; modeling; spatial ecology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrushenko, A. Yu., Zhukov, A.V. (2016). Scale-dependent effects in structure of the wintering ecological niche of the mute swan during wintering in the gulf of Sivash. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (3), 234–247 (in Russian).

Baljuk, J.A., Kunah, O.N., Zhukov, A. V., Zadorozhnaja, G. A., Ganzha, D.S. (2014). Sampling adaptive strategy and spatial organisation estimation of soil animal communities at various hierarchical levels of urbanised territories. Biological Bulletin. 4(3), 8–33 (in Russian).

Belgard, A.L. (1950). Forest vegetation of South–Eeast part of the USSR. Kiev: Kiev State University (in Russian).

Belgard, A.L. (1971). Steppe Forestry. Moscow: Forest Industry (in Russian).

Bell, G. (2001). Neutral macroecology. Science, 293, 2413–2418.

Blondel, J., Vuilleumier, F., Marcus, L.F., Terouanne, E., (1984). Is there ecomorphological convergence among mediterranean bird communities of Chile, California, and France. In: Hecht, M.K., Wallace, B., MacIntyre, R.J. (Eds.), Evolutionary Biology. Plenum Press, New York, 141–213.

Cavender-Bares, J., Ackerly, D.D., Baum, D.A. Bazzaz, F.A. (2004). Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities. American Naturalist, 163, 823–843.

Cavender-Bares, J., Keen, A., Miles, B. (2006). Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. Ecology, 87, 109 –122.

Cavender-Bares, J., Kozak, K.H., et al. (2009). The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett., 12, 693–715.

Chesson, P. (1991). A need for niches? Trends in Ecology, Evolution, 6, 26–28.

Cody, M.L., Mooney, H.A., (1978). Convergence versus nonconvergence in mediterranean-climate ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 9, 265–321.

Diamond, J.M. (1975). Assembly of species communities. In Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds). Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Cambridge, UK: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 342–444.

Dobrochaeva, D.N., Kotov, M. I. (1987). The identification key of higher plants in Ukraine. Kiev, Naukova dumka (in Russian).

Doledec, S., Chessel, D., Ter Braak, C.J.F., Champely, S. (1996). Matching species traits to environmental variables: A new three-table ordination method. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 3, 143–166.

Elton, C. (1946). Competition and the structure of ecological communities. Journal of Animal Ecology, 15, 54–68.

Euro+Med (2006-2016): Euro+Med PlantBase - the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. Available from http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/ [Accessed on 01.01.2017].

Faith, D. P. (1992). Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation, 61, 1–10.

Gause, G. (1931). The influence of ecological factors on the size of population. Am. Nat., 65, 70–76.

Gause, G. F. (1934). The struggle for existence. MacMillan, New York.

Gilbert, G.S.,Webb, C.O. (2007). Phylogenetic signal in plant pathogen–host range. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, United States of America, 104, 4979–4983.

Gotelli, N. J. (2000). Null model analysis of species cooccurrence patterns. Ecology, 81, 2606–2621.

Hardy, O. J. (2008). Testing the spatial phylogenetic structure of local communities: statistical performances of different null models and test statistics on a locally neutral community. Journal of Ecology, 96, 914–926.

Hardy, O.J. Senterre, B. (2007). Characterizing the phylogenetic structure of communities by an additive partitioning of phylogenetic diversity. Journal of Ecology, 95, 493–506.

Havrda, M., Charvat, F. (1967). Quantification method of classification processes: concept of structurala-entropy. Kybernetik, 3, 30–35.

Hertweck, K. L., Kinney, M. S., Stuart, S. A., Maurin, O., Mathews, S., Chase, M. W., Gandolfo, M. A., Pires, J. Ch. (2015). Phylogenetics, divergence times and diversification from three genomic partitions in monocots. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 178 (3), 375–393, doi:10.1111/boj.12260

Hill, M.O. (1973). Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination. J. Ecol., 61, 237–249.

Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Izsak, J., Papp, L. (1995). Application of the quadratic entropy indices for diversity studies of drosophilid assemblages. Environ. Ecol. Stat., 2, 213–224.

Karatzoglou, A., Smola, A., Hornik, K., Zeileis, A. (2004). Kernlab – An S4 Package for Kernel Methods in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 11(9), 1–20. Available from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v11/i09/

Kosets, M. I., Tkachanko, V. S. (1973). The vegetation of the sand. The vegetation of the URSR. Kyiv, Naukova dumka (in Ukranian).

Kunah, O.N., Kolada, V. V. (2010). The reflection of the technosems in geographical and ecological spaces. Dnipropetrovsk State Agrarian University Visnik, 1, 56–60 (in Russian).

Lamouroux, N., LeRoy Poff, N., Angermeier, P.L. (2002). Intercontinental convergence of stream fish community traits along geomorphic and hydraulic gradients. Ecology, 83, 1792–1807.

Legendre, P., Gallagher, E. D. (2001). Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species. Oecologia, 271–280.

Leibold, M. (1998). Similarity and local coexistence of species in regional biotas. Evolutionary Ecology, 12, 95–100.

Lord, J., Westoby, M., Leishman, M. (1995). Seed size and phylogeny in 6 temperate floras – constraints, niche conservatism, and adaptation. American Naturalist, 146, 349–364.

Losos, J.B., (1992). The evolution of convergent structure in Caribbean Anoliscommunities. Syst. Biol., 41, 403–420.

MacArthur, R., Levins, R. (1967). The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. American Naturalist, 101, 377–385.

Pavoine, S., Love, M.S., Bonsall, M.B. (2009). Hierarchical partitioning of evolutionary and ecological patterns in the organization of phylogenetically-structured species assemblages: application to rockfish (genus: Sebastes) in the Southern California Bight. Ecology Letters, 12, 898–908.

Pavoine, S., Dufour, A.–B., Chessel, D. (2004). From dissimilarities among species to dissimilarities among communities: a double principal coordinate analysis. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 228, 523–537.

Potapenko, O.V., Zhukov, O.V. (2016). Ecomorphic analysis of the plant cover of the electrical power substation. Issues of steppe forestry and forest reclamation of soils, 45, 138–147 (in Russian).

Qian, H, Hao, Z, Zhang, J. (2014). Phylogenetic structure and phylogenetic diversity of angiosperm assemblages in forests along an elevational gradient in Changbaishan, China. J Plant Ecol., 7, 154–65.

Qian, H., Y. Jin. (2016). An updated megaphylogeny of plants, a tool for generating plant phylogenies and an analysis of phylogenetic community structure. Journal of Plant Ecology, 9(2), 233–239.

R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

Rao, C. R. (1982). Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach. Theor. Popul. Biol., 21, 24–43.

Ricklefs, R.E. (1987). Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science, 235, 167–71.

Ricklefs, R.E., Schluter, D. (1993). Species diversity: regional and historical influences. In Ricklefs, R.E., Schluter, D. (eds). Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 350–363.

Shannon, C. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technology Journal., 27, 379–423.

Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688.

Sokolov, S. G., Zhukov, A. V. (2016). The Diversity of Parasites in the Chinese Sleeper Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877 (Actinopterygii: Perciformes) under the Conditions of Large-Scale Range Expansion. Biology Bulletin, 43, 4, 374–383.

The Plant List. (2013). Version 1.1. Available from http://www.theplantlist.org/ (Accessed on 01.01.2017).

Tilman, D. (1982). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Tofts, R., Silvertown, J. (2000). A phylogenetic approach to community assembly from a local species pool. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 267, 363–369.

Ulrich, W. (2004). Species co-occurrences and neutral models: reassessing J.M. Diamond’s assembly rules. Oikos, 107, 603–609.

Voronov, A. G. (1973). Geobotany. Moscow: Vischaya shola (in Russian).

Warwick, R. M, Clarke, K. R. (1995). New ‘biodiversity’ measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 129, 301–305.

Webb, C. O., Donoghue, M. J. (2005). Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Molecular Ecology Notes. , 5, 1, 181–183, doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00829.x

Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D.D., McPeek, M.A., Donoghue, M.J. (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 33, 475–505.

Weiher, E., Clarke, G., Keddy, P. (1998). Community assembly rules, morphological dispersion, and the coexistence of plant species. Oikos, 81, 309–322.

Weiher, E., Keddy, P. (1995). The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities. Oikos, 73, 323–335.

Weiher, E., Keddy, P. (1999). Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wikström, N., Savolainen, V, Chase, M. (2001). Evolution of the angiosperms: Calibrating the family tree. PNAS, 268, 2211–2220.

Zanne, A.E., Tank, D.C., Cornwell, W.K. et al. (2014). Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature, 506, 89–92.

Zhukov, A. V. (2015a). Phytoindicator estamation of the multidimensional scaling of the plant community structure. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 1 (1), 69–93 (in Russian).

Zhukov, A.V. (2015b). Phytoindicator estamation of the multidimensional scaling dimantion of the plant Communities structure. Chornomors’k. bot. z., 11(1), 84-98 (in Ukranian). doi:10.14255/2308-9628/15.111/8.

Zhukov, O.V., Pisarenko, P.V., Kunah, O.M., Dichenko, O.J. (2015). Role of landscape diversity in dynamics of abundance of sugar beet pests population in Poltava region. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology, 23, 1, 21–27 (in Ukranian).

Zhukov, A. V., Kunah, O. Y., Zadorozhnaja, G. A., Andrusevich E. V. (2013). Landscape ecology as a basis of the spatial analysis of agrocoenosis productivity. Ecology and Noospherology, 24, 1–2, 68–80 (in Russian).

Zhukov, A.V., Kunah, O.N., Novikova, V.A., Ganzha, D.S. (2016a). Phyitoindicacion estimation of soil mesopedobionts communities catena and their ecomorphic organization. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (3), 91–117 (in Russian).

Zhukov, O.V., Gofman, O.V. (2016). Analysis of time series ndvi for vegetation of Velykyi Chapelskyi pid for 2010–2015. The Scientific Notes of NaUKMA, 184, 40–46 (in Ukranian).

Zhukov, O.V., Kunah, O.M., Taran, V.O., Lebedinska, M. M. (2016b). Spatial variability of soils electrical conductivity within arena of the river dnepr valley (territory of the natural reserve “Dniprovsko-Orilsky”). Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (2), 129–157 (in Ukranian).

Zhukov, O.V., Potapenko, O.V. (2016). Environmental impact assessment of distribution substations: the case of phytoindication. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 7(1), 5–21 (in Ukranian).

Zhukov, O.V., Shatalin D. B. (2016). Earthworms (Lumbricidae) ecological niche in the hygrotopes and trophotopes space of the steppe Pridniprovie biogeocoenosis. Biologigical Resources and Nature Management, 8, 3–4, 53–67 (in Ukranian).

Zimaroeva, A., Zhukov, A., Ponomarenko, A. (2015a). Determining spatial parameters of the ecological niche of Parus major (Passeriformes, Paridae) on the base of remote sensing data. Vestnik zoologii, 49(2), 451–456.

Zimaroeva, A., Zhukov, A., Ponomarenko, A., Matsura, A. (2015b). Ecological niche modelling of Fringilla coelebs Linnaeus, 1758 (сommon chaffinch) using GIS tools. ROM. J. BIOL. – ZOOL., 60, 2, 135–146.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15421/2017_19

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Since April 2018 Journal changed the editorial policy and starts to be published exclusively in English, and changed its main site into www.ujecology.com

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© 2017 Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. ISSN 2520-2138